Support
for Attention Research Update is provided
by Cogmed
Cogmed has developed a computerized
training program to improve
working memory, which is a frequent problem for children and adults
with ADHD. Research has shown that Cogmed's program can enhance
working memory, and that improvements in working memory are associated
with reductions in attention and learning problems. You can learn
more at
Cogmed.com.
Clinicians interested
in learning about the
benefits of
incorporating working memory training into their practice are invited
to
request an information package for
professionals.
There are a number of reason why there is a pressing
need to develop
treatments for ADHD in addition to medication and behavior therapy that
have strong research support.
Regarding medication, not all children benefit from taking it, some
experience intolerable side effects, and many continue to struggle even
though medication may be helpful. Behavior therapy can be difficult for
parents and/or teachers to consistently implement and does not
generally reduce behavior difficulties to normative
levels.
Furthermore, even though both treatments can be extremely helpful in
managing ADHD symptoms and reducing oppositional behavior, they do not
induce lasting changes in the child that persist after treatments is
discontinued. Finally, despite numerous studies
documenting the short- and intermediate term benefits of these
treatments, the impact on children's long-term success remains to be
clearly documented.
In addition to these important limitations of what are currently
treatments for ADHD with the most extensive research support, prior
research has shown that attention difficulties, even when they may not
be severe enough to warrant a diagnosis of ADHD, can often have
important adverse effects on children's academic performance. For
children with more moderate attention difficulties who are not
diagnosed with ADHD, medication would generally not be considered an
appropriate treatment; however, improving their attention and on-task
behavior in the classroom remains important.
Because of these limitations with conventional treatments, there have
been numerous efforts to develop alternative and complementary
treatments for ADHD that may enhance the benefits offered by
medication and behavior therapy. I am well aware that many
subscribers to Attention Research Update have a keen interest in
research on such interventions, and was thus pleased to find a very
interesting study recently on the use of yoga as an intervention for
children with attention difficulties (Peck, H., (2005). Yoga as an
intervention for children with attention problems. School Psychology Review, 34,
415-424).
As you are probably aware, yoga "...incorporates physical postures,
breath control, mental concentration, and deep relaxation..." in an
effort to positively affect mental states.
Practitioners report that it produces similar effects as relaxation
training and tends to "...promote self-control, attention, and
concentration." Thus, the purported outcomes of yoga suggest that
it could be a helpful intervention for children with attention
difficulties, as it "...seems sensible that children's heightened boy
awareness, reduced tension, and improved concentration would be
conducive to learning.
Participants in this study were 10 1st - 3rd grade children (3 boys and
7 girls) whose teacher had referred them for consultation services at
their school because of concerns related to attention difficulties in
the classroom. None of the children had been formally diagnosed
with ADHD and none were receiving medication for attention
difficulties.
Yoga Intervention
The Yoga intervention was delivered using the "Yoga Fitness for Kids"
videotape, a commercially available product (See http://www.gaiam.com
and search for Yoga for Kids; note that video for older children does
not seem to be available.) The videotape required children to follow an
adult instructor and 3 children as they engaged in deep breathing,
physical postures, and relaxation exercises. The videotapes
depicted movement between various physical postures in an
age-appropriate and game like manner, and the instructor frequently
reminded the children to take slow, deep breaths when engaging in the
postures. Each session concluded with guided imagery "...where
the children laid on their backs on the floor envisioning peaceful
images such as being a seed that sprouted into a beautiful flower."
Students were grouped for the intervention by grade level and the yoga
sessions were thus conducted in small groups rather than
individually. The sessions were held during the school day for 30
minutes, twice a week, over a period of 3 weeks. All children
attended each session and reported that they enjoyed it very much.
Study Design
There were 3 phases to the study - a baseline phase that lasted at
least 3 weeks, the 3-week intervention phases, and then a 3-week
follow-up phase. During each week, participants were observed for
2 10-minute sessions each week so that their time on task over the
entire study could be determined. Children were engaged in either
whole group lessons or individual seatwork, most often in language
arts, during the observations.
At the time that each participant was observed, a child of the same
gender as the participant was observed to serve as a comparison peer,
which a different child serving as the comparison during each 10-second
observation interval. A second trained observer independently
coded 20% of all observation sessions to determine that the coding
system was being used reliably, and the observers agreed about whether
the child was on- vs. off-task for over 90% of the joint
observations. Thus, there was good evidence that the behavior
observations were reliable.
This procedure provided a careful measure of how time on-task during
the study for children referred for attention difficulties who had
received the intervention compared to their classmates who had neither
been referred for attention difficulties nor received the yoga
intervention.
RESULTS
If the yoga intervention was helpful, one would expect that
participants would have been on-task substantially less often
than peers during the baseline phase, but that this difference would
diminish or disappear when the intervention began. Ideally,
partcipants increase in on-task behavior would persist across the
3-week follow-up period.
As expected, there was a substantial difference in on-task behavior
between students with attention difficulties and their classmates
during the baseline phase. On average, intervention students were
observed to be on-task only about 65% of the time, compared to about
85% of the time for their classmates. This is a substantial
difference and one can imagine being on task an average of 20% less
often than classmates how over an entire school year could have an
important adverse impact on students' acquisition of academic skills as
well as their performing up to their ability level.
During the 3-week intervention phase, during which students were
observed a total of 6 times, this significant time on-task difference
disappeared. In fact, during the intervention, students with
attention difficulties were observed to be on-task at virtually the
exact same rate as comparison students.
For the 3-week follow-up period, a reduction in on-task behavior for
intervention students was observed, as they were once again on-task
less often than their classmates. However, despite this decline,
they did continue to demonstrate higher rates of on-task behavior than
they had during the baseline period. Thus, even
though the intervention benefits had diminished, there remained some
evidence of continued benefits.
SUMMARY and
IMPLICATIONS
Results from this interesting study provide preliminary evidence that
yoga may be a helpful intervention for improving time on-task in the
classroom for students with attention difficulties.
In this report, the beneficial affects associated with yoga practice
occurred quickly, showed some evidence of persisting beyond the
training itself, and essentially normalized rates of on-task behavior
for formally inattentive students during the time that yoga training
was occurring.
These are certainly promising results and the authors of this
interesting study should be commended for their effort to
systematically study the potential benefits of this approach.
Despite the promising nature of these findings, which clearly support
the need for additional research in this area, it is important to
recognize several important study limitations that would need to be
addressed before any definitive conclusions about the impact of yoga on
attentional difficulties could be addressed.
The most important limitation - in addition to the small sample size -
is that the research who conducted the majority of the behavioral
observations was the same person who supervised the yoga
intervention. This certainly has the potential to have biased the
results, although the fact that the researcher adhered strictly to the
strictly defined criteria for time on-task and that good reliability
with an independent observer was attained, mitigates somewhat against
this concern. However, as the researchers themselves note, it
would be essential to replicate these results using an observer who is
blind to the purpose of the study and to which children had received
the intervention.
A second limitation is the absence of a control
group. In this study, students essentially served as
their own controls by examining their on-task behavior before, during,
and after the yoga intervention. However, a stronger design would
be one where a larger group of students with attention dfficulties were
randomly assigned to receive the yoga intervention or to a control
condition in which they also met in small groups with an adult but did
not engage in the yoga training.
Documenting that only children who received yoga showed the increase in
on-task behavior would enable one to have greater confidence that yoga
training itself, and not simply extra time with a supportive adult, is
what was responsible for the gains. As noted above, observers in
such a study would need to be blind to whether children were in the
experimental or control groups.
Finally, given the adverse impact that attention problems have on
children's academic achivement and performance, it would also be
helpful to incorporate assessments of children's academic
performance. Documenting that yoga training enhances day-to-day
academic performance in addition to time on-task would be an important
addition to the study findings and one that could be used to justify
pulling students from the classroom to receive such training.
In addition, because participants in this study were not formally
diagnosed with ADHD, it would also be quite important to test whether
this intervention can be helpful to students' whose difficulties with
attention are likely to be more severe than many of the children who
took part in the current investigation.
Until a follow-up study with these factors has been conducted, it is
not possible to draw any firm conclusions about the impact of yoga on
students with attention difficulties, even though the results reported
here appear promising. Hopefully, these promising results will
stimulate other researchers to conduct a more extensive and better
controlled trial of yoga as an intervention for ADHD, so that more
definitive conclusions about the potential benefits of this
complementary intervention approach can be made.