Although many children are misdiagnosed
with ADHD and treated with ADHD
medications inappropriately, it is also true that a large percentage of
children and teens with ADHD do not receive pharmacological
treatment. In fact, it has been estimated that only 25-50% of
children with ADHD receive such treatment and that of those who do, the
modal number of prescriptions filled each year is 4-8. Because
medication treatment can be helpful for many children - especially when
used in conjunction with behavioral and educational interventions - it
is important to understand why many parents choose not to pursue this
option for their child.
This issue was examined in a recently published study involving over
850 families who had a child diagnosed with ADHHD by a primary care
physician, but who either never started medication treatment or who
discontinued such treatment within 3 months (Monastra, V.J. 2005.
Overcoming the barriers to effective treatment for
attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A neuro-educational approach.
International Journal of
Psychophysiology, 58, 71-80).
Parents were asked about the concerns that led them to decline
medication treatment for their child or to discontinue medication
shortly after starting it. The results of this survey were quite
interesting.
The reason cited most often for not beginning medication treatment -
reported by 92% of parents in the sample - was fear of medication side
effects. What is important to note about this is that when ADHD
medication treatment is monitored carefully, it is relatively
infrequent for a child to need to discontinue treatment because of
adverse side effects. Thus, many parents may pass up this
treatment option for their child based on concerns about side effects
that are in excess of their actual occurrence. This suggests that
physicians should devote more time to explaining possible side effects
to parents, the likelihood that those side effects will occur, and how
they can be dealt with if they do.
The second most frequently cited reason for declining medication
treatment - reported by 90% of parents - was "discomfort using
medication without direct testing of attention." This is
particularly important because current ADHD evaluation guidelines from
the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Child
and Adolescent Psychiatry do not call for the routine use of any such
procedure. Instead, assessment guidelines call for a careful
review of patient history, and the use of interviews - ideally with
both parents and teachers - to determine whether the child meets ADHD
diagnostic criteria. In making this determination, the use of
standardized behavior rating scales are also recommended. Direct
testing of attention using computerized tests, or direct measures of
the child's brain functioning, are not. In fact, guidelines from
the American Academy of Pediatrics specifically state that "other
diagnostic tests are not routinely indicated to establish the diagnosis
of ADHD".
Although it is true that while such procedures may not be necessary to
correctly diagnose ADHD, many parents lack confidence in an assessment
process that is limited to interview, review of patient history, and
behavior rating scales. In fact, the absence of more "objective"
data in the assessment process is apparently a frequent contributor to
parents failing to follow through with treatment recommendations from
their child's physician. Routinely incorporating such measure into ADHD
evaluations could thus be an important way - as we will learn from the
second part of this study - to enhance compliance with recommended
treatments.
These two reasons - concerns about side effects and an assessment
process that lacked "objective" procedures - were far and away the
leading reasons that parents chose not to try medication with their
child. What about parents who were willing to initiate such
treatment but who discontinued it within 3 months. In this case,
the most frequently cited reasons were the development of side effects
- reported by 49% of parents - and continued problems at home or school
despite medication - reported by 48%.
This is important information for several reasons. First, as we
will see below, side effects that may be common occurrences early on in
medication treatment frequently dissipate over time. When
families are unaware of this fact, however, many may opt to stop a
treatment that is helping their child. Second, even when children are
started on the best medication and dose for them, it is common
for symptoms and difficulties to reemerge over time. When this
occurs, however, adjusting the dose and/or medication prescribed can
often result in better management of core symptoms. If families are not
educated in advance about this possibility, however, many will choose
to end their child's treatment based on the assumption that it is no
longer being helpful. (For additional information on the frequent
need for treatment adjustments, please see a prior issue of Attention
Research Update that can be found at
www.helpforadd.com/2001/march.htm
STUDY
2
Results summarized above highlight that concerns about side effects and
evaluations that do not include objective assessment procedures keep
many parents from beginning medication treatment for their child. The
emergence of side effects and continued problems despite the use of
medication are key reasons for discontinuing such treatment within a
short time period. Addressing these issues could thus result in
more parents being willing to try their child on medication and to
continue such treatment beyond several months.
A follow-up study involving 658 families with a child who had been
diagnosed with ADHD by the child's primary care physician, and who had
declined or discontinued medication treatment, describes an attempt to
do just that. None of these families had participated in the
survey study summarized above.
To address parents' desire for objective measurements as part of their
child's evaluation, a computerized test of attention and a quantitative
electronencephalgraph (QEEG) were administered to each child.
Results from these assessments were reviewed with parents to provide
objective, concrete data about their child's attention difficulties, as
well as to help them understand the biological underpinnings of those
difficulties. (To review studies on the use of QEEG to assist in the
diagnosis of ADHD, please see http://www.helpforadd.com/2001/april.htm
and http://www.helpforadd.com/yr2000/april.htm ).
To further address parental concerns, parents were given a manual that
included extensive educational information about the causes of ADHD,
the rational for using medication, possible medication side effects as
well as strategies for reducing them, tips for improving diet, sleep,
and exercise habits, and the importance of adequate support and
accommodation at school. The manual also presented strategies for
addressing common difficulties that often persist even after medication
treatment is underway.
A detailed report of assessment findings along with a comprehensive set
of treatment recommendations were provided to parents, as well as to
each child's physician and school. For children where assessment
results continued to support an ADHD diagnosis, medication treatment
was part of these recommendations. Prior to beginning any such
treatment, however, an evaluation to rule out possible medical reasons
for the child's ADHD symptoms (e.g., allergies, anemia, sleep apnea,
vitamin or mineral deficiencies) was recommended. Because QEEG
results may be helpful in predicting response to different types of
ADHD medications (more research in this area is needed),
recommendations for stimulant vs. non-stimulant medications were made
based on each child's QEEG profile.
RESULTS
Whether parents chose to pursue the treatment approach recommended,
including medication treatment, was, of course, up to each
parent. The researchers were interested in whether providing
parents with objective measures of their child's attention
difficulties, along with educational information about the causes of
ADHD and the rational for medical treatment, would impact parents'
willingness to initiate and sustain medication treatment for their
child. As noted above, all parents had previously not followed
recommendations for medication treatment made by their child's
physician, or had discontinued such treatment within 3 months.
Follow up information was collected from parents at 6 weeks, as well as
at 6, 12, and 24 months. At 6 weeks, approximately 70% of parents
had begun medication treatment for their child; the primary reason for
not beginning treatment was the inability to schedule and complete the
recommended medical evaluation. Over 20% of parents continued to
cite fears of using medication, and relatively few - only 3% - cited a
desire to try alternative treatments before beginning medication.
By 6 months, over 95% of parents had initiated medication treatment for
their child. Of particular note is that over 95% of children continued
to be receiving medication treatment at the 2-year follow up.
SIDE EFFECTS
Information on side effects was also obtained at each follow-up
assessment. At the 6-week time point, reports of side effects
were relatively common. In fact, over 90% of parents reported
observing appetite loss and sleep difficulties, over 80% reported that
their child had lost at least 5 pounds, and over 50% reported that
their child was showing increased irritability. Increased
symptoms of depression were reported by 25%. Such side effects
are what lead many families to discontinue their child's medication
therapy.
By 6 months, reported side effects had declined by approximately 50%
and by the 2-year follow-up, the only side effect that continued to be
reported by 15% of parents was appetite suppression. Thus, parents
clearly observed a substantial decline in medication side effects for
their child over time.
SUMMARY
AND IMPLICATIONS
It is important to stress that this study should not be construed as
supporting the use of medication treatment for all children with
ADHD. This continues to be a decision that should be made by each
parent in consultation with a qualified health care professional.
In fact, as noted above, the author of this study has done some of the
best treatment research on neurofeedback that I am aware of and
advocates a comprehensive approach that includes behavioral and
academic interventions, as well as attending to the importance of
nutrition, exercise, and sleep. In addition, as the author
clearly notes, this study did not examine long-term outcomes for
children, so information on the effectiveness of long-term medication
treatment cannot be gleaned from this work.
What is important about this study - in my view - is the clear
information it provides about some of the key reasons why parents
decline to pursue medication treatment for their child. For many
parents who decline to follow such a recommendation from their child's
doctor, concerns about medication side effects are a critical
issue. As this study indicates, however, educating parents about
possible side effects along with strategies for addressing them, can
result in many parents being willing to begin and sustain such
treatment. It was also noteworthy that the side effects which
parents observed in their child declined substantially over time.
The results also highlight how important it is too many parents for
objective assessment procedures to be part of their child's ADHD
evaluation. Ninety percent of parents who declined medication
treatment cited the absence of such procedures as one of their reasons
for not following the doctor's recommendation. Thus, even though
many physicians and ADHD experts may argue that procedures such as
computerized attention tests of QEEG are not necessary to routinely
include in ADHD evaluations, the objectivity provided by such
procedures is something that many parents desire. This seems
critically important for professionals to keep in mind, as results from
this study clearly suggest that this may be important in
enhancing parents' willingness to follow through with recommended
treatments for their child.