Support
for Attention Research Update is provided
by Cogmed
Cogmed has developed a computerized
training program to improve
working memory, which is a frequent problem for children and adults
with ADHD. Research has shown that Cogmed's program can enhance
working memory, and that improvements in working memory are associated
with reductions in attention and learning problems. You can learn
more at Cogmed.com. Clinicians interested
in learning about the
benefits of
incorporating working memory training into their practice are invited
to request an information package for
professionals.
Landmark College
is the nation's leading institution of higher learning for students
with ADHD and learning disabilities. For more than 20 years,
Landmark College has been the pioneer in higher education services for
young men and women with ADHD, ad offers a wide range of specialized
programs for students with these learning challenges. You can
learn more about this outstanding institution at www.Landmark.edu.
Although thousands of studies on children with ADHD
and their families
have been conducted, it is surprising how little is known about the
quality of their day-to-day lives. Behavior rating scales tell us
relatively little about the quality of moment-to-moment interactions,
and observational studies, although a rich source of data, are
necessarily limited to extremely small samples of time.
A fascinating study to be published in an upcoming issue of the Journal
of Abnormal Child Psychology addresses this important gap in the
literature (Whalen, et al. (2006). Toward mapping daily challenges of
living with ADHD: Maternal and Child Perspective using Electronic
Diaries).
In this study, Personal Digital Assistants - PDAs - were used to
provide a unique window into the challenges of living with ADHD,
challenges that remain despite important benefits that may be provided
by medication treatment.
Participants were 27 children with ADHD (average age 10.5 years, 18
boys, 9 girls) and their moms as well as 25 children without ADHD
(average age 10.5 years, 15 boys, 10 girls) and their moms. All
children in the ADHD group were being treated with a long acting
stimulant - either Concerta or Adderall XR - at the time of the
study. Children in the comparison group had no known learning or
behavioral problems. Because the authors were interested in
examining mother-child relationship issues, enrollment was limited to
mother-child dyads together for at least 4 hours each day.
To learn about participants' the day to day experience, electronic
diary monitoring using Personal Digital Assistants - PDAs - was
scheduled across 7 consecutive days during nonschool hours. The
PDAs were programmed to beep approximately every 30 minutes to signal
that it was time to complete a diary checklist. Both mothers and
children had their own PDA, which were programmed to beep at different
times, and each completed their own electronic diary. The PDAs
were programmed to beep when mothers and children were likely to be
together - before school, after school, and on weekends.
The diary items were selected to "...tap contexts, behaviors, and moods
that are relevant to the daily lives of parents and school age
children, to capture the quality of their interactions, and to include
dimensions that often prove problematic for children with ADHD.
Each time the PDA beeped, participants used the PDA to identify their
location, social context, i.e., by themselves, with each other, with
peers, and their current activity. Then, mother and child rated
the child's symptomatic behaviors (e.g., impatient, restless), and
moods (.e.g., angry, good mood). Mothers also rated their own
moods. Each also rated the difficulty of the activity they were
currently engaged in and evaluated their ability to do it
successfully.
Despite the frequent recording demands, moms and children did a good
job of completing the diary entries. Mothers received an average
of 91 signals to complete a diary entry during the 7-day period while
children received an average of 95 signals. Completion rates were
approximately 90% for mothers and children, and did not differ between
the ADHD and comparison group. Thus, even though some children in
the study were as young as 8, the use of a PDA to learn about
children's ongoing experience appears to be a very viable research
method.
RESULTS
- Child Problem Behaviors -
Compared to mothers of comparison children, mothers of children with
ADHD were more likely to record their child as displaying problematic
behavior when prompted by the PDA. The specific results are as
follows:
Impatience - 26% vs. 12%
Restless - 34% vs. 7%
Talking too much - 20% vs. 7%
Too loud - 17% vs. 7%
Thus, during 26% of the nearly 100 recording intervals spread across
the week, moms of children with ADHD rated their child as displaying
impatience. In contrast, moms of comparison children observed
impatience during only 12% of the intervals. The other problem
behaviors can be interpreted in a similar manner. These results
highlight that moms of children with ADHD felt themselves to be dealing
with challenging behavior far more often, and provides an indication of
the greater challenges they face on a daily basis, DESPITE the fact
that their child was receiving medication treatment.
Interestingly, ratings provided by children did not show the same
differences. In fact, children with ADHD did not report that they
were engaging in these problem behaviors at higher rates than
comparison children, and highly the significant discrepancy between
maternal and child perception of children's behavior.
- Child Moods -
Mothers of children with ADHD were also more likely than moms of
comparison children to observe their child in problematic mood
states. The specific results are as follows:
Bored - 15% vs. 9%
Sad/discouraged - 11% vs. 4%
Angry/frustrated - 19% vs. 10%
Stress - 14% vs. 11%
Good mood - 71% vs. 79%
Thus, during 15% of the nearly 100 recording intervals spread across
the week, moms of children with ADHD rated their child as displaying
boredom. In contrast, bordeom was observed by moms of comparison
children during 9% of the intervals. The other mood states can be
interpreted in a similar manner. Although these differences in
observed mood are not as pronounced as differences in problem behavior,
they point to a consistent pattern in which moms of children with ADHD
were more likely to see their child in a negative mood state and less
likely to see their child in a positive mood.
In rating their own moods, differences between children with and
without ADHD were also found. Specifically, in the mornings,
children with ADHD were three times more likely than comparison
children to report being sad (7.5% of morning recording intervals vs.
2.5%). They also reported over three times the rate of
restlessness (14% vs. 4%).
There were also intriguing differences between weekend and weekday
reports in children's self-reported moods. In fact, children with
ADHD were over 10 times more likely than comparison children to report
feeling stressed during the weekend, reporting this in 10% of weekend
diary entries. In conjunction with the findings reported above,
these results suggest that mornings and weekends pose special
challenges for children with ADHD.
- Time Spent Together: Negative
Affect and Quality of Interactions -
There were no significant differences in the percentage of recording
intervals that mothers and children in the two groups reported being
together. There were, however, important differences in the
report quality of that time.
Group differences in mom's report of feeling angry when children were
present were particularly striking. Mothers of children with ADHD
were over one and a half times as likely to report being angry when
they were with their child than when not with their child. They
were also more than 3 times as likely to report diagreeing with their
child, reporting this for 10% of the intervals when they were with
their child vs. only 3% for comparison mothers.
This was echoed in children reports, as children with ADHD reported
disagreeing with their moms in 7% of intervals vs. 3% for comparison
children. Thus, although the absolute rate of reporting
disagreement was relatively low, it was still a substantially more
common experience for children with ADHD and their mothers.
- Parenting Perceptions and Quality
of Day -
Mothers of children with ADHD were only half as likely as mothers of
comparison children to report that their child made them feel good as a
parent. They were also less likely to report feeling effective as
a parent and to report that their child limited both their and their
families' activities.
SUMMARY
AND
IMPLICATIONS
The use of PDAs to provide snap shots into the experience of children
with ADHD and their mothers at multiple times across a typical week
provides a unique insight into the challenges that each experience.
Although all children were being treated with stimulant medication -
the treatment approach that currently has the strongest empirical
support - the daily experience of children with ADHD and their moms
still differed in important ways from that of other mother-child dyads.
Specifically, children with ADHD displayed higher rates of symptomatic
behaviors, including restlessness, excessive talk and loudness,
impatience, and difficulty concentrating. Mothers reported that these
types of problematic behaviors occurred anywhere from 2 to 5 times as
frequently as mothers of comparison children.
In addition, children with ADHD were more likely to be seen by their
mothers as angry, frustrated, and sad or discouraged and their
interactions with their mothers were more likely to be marked by
disagreement. Based on children's own reports, mornings and
weekends were particularly challenging times, and they reported feeling
stressed on the weekends over 10 times as often as comparison
children.
Greater difficulty in the morning may be related to difficulties
getting organized and ready for school. On the weekends, however,
children's schedule is typically more flexible, so this would seem
unlikely to explain their more frequently report stress. Instead,
this may relate to the difficulty children with ADHD often have in peer
relationships, which could result in fewer opportunities to participate
successfully in organized peer group activities such as team
sports. This, of course, is quite speculative.
Although mothers of children with ADHD did not report more anger in
general, their anger rates were elevated relative to other mothers when
they were with their children. They were also more likely to
report feeling ineffective as a parent and that their child was
limiting their activities. This pattern of results suggests that
children with ADHD "...may indeed have an impact on parenting
interactions and the quality of family life, even when these children
are being successfully treated with pharmacotherapy."
Overall, results from this intriguing study point to continued
difficulties in the daily experience of children with ADHD and their
mothers, and highlight that medication treatment - although it can be
extremely helpful to many children - often fails to normalize
children's behavior. Instead, residual difficulties often adversely
impact the daily lives of children with ADHD and their parents.
Of course, this does not necessarily apply to all children with ADHD
and their parents, although the overall group trends were quite clear.
There are important limitations to this study that should be
acknowledged.
The sample size was relatively small, and the period of data collection
- 1 week - was relatively short. Also, the sample was
predominantly middle class, and whether the findings would generalize
to families of different socioeconomic status is unclear.
It should also be noted that the medication treatment received by these
children was provided in regular community settings, which is often
less carefully monitored and effective than what is found in clinical
research trials. Thus, it is certainly possible that medication
treatment provided in a more stringent manner would eliminate, or at
least reduce, many of the residual difficulties that were clearly
evident in this sample.
The clear discrepancies in the report of problematic behavior provided
by children and mothers, with mothers reporting higher rates of
symptomatic behavior, is also worthy of consideration. Whether
mothers were "over reporting" or children were "under reporting" cannot
be determined by this study, although biased reporting among parents of
children with ADHD has not been found in prior studies.
Finally, it should be emphasized that one should not assume that
problematic behavior in children with ADHD caused their mothers to feel
angrier or less effective as parents. Cause and effect
relationships cannot be established in studies like this, tempting
though such inferences are to make.
Despite these limitations, the creative data collection methods used in
this study provides us with a fine-grained assessment of the ongoing
experience of children with ADHD and their moms. What has been
documented is continued problematic behaviors and moods in children
with ADHD, as well as negative impacts on mothers and families.
Such findngs highlight the need to better understand the experience of
children with ADHD and their families, the continued need to develop
treatments that can complement benefits that medication can provide,
and "...the need to extend treatment targets beyond the identifed child
to include parents and perhaps other family members." The study
also documents the value that technology such as PDAs can play in
helping us to better understand what it is like for children with ADHD
and their parents.