As implied in the title of his book, "ADHD and the
Nature of Self-Control", Dr. Barkley argues that the fundamental
deficit in individuals with ADHD is one of self-control, and that
problems with attention are a secondary characteristic of the
disorder. He also believes that individuals with the inattentive
type of ADHD, which is characterized by attention difficulties but not
problems with hyperactive impulsive behavior, have a different disorder
than those who have both types of symptoms. The theory that he
lays out, and which is summarized below, applies in his view to ADHD
where both inattentive and hyperactive-impulsive symptoms are prominent.
Dr. Barkley emphasizes that during the course of development, control
over a child's behavior gradually shifts from external sources to being
increasingly governed by internal rules and standards.
Controlling one's behavior by internal rules and standards is what is
meant by the term "self-control".
For example, young children have very little ability to refrain from
acting on an impulse - i.e. to "inhibit" their behavior. Instead, it is
more typical for a young child to "act out" the things that pop into
his or her mind. In addition, when a young child is able to refrain
from acting on impulse, it is often because something in the immediate
surroundings keeps them from doing so. For example, the child may
refrain from throwing a toy when frustrated because his mother is
present, and he knows he will be punished if he throws it.
This is different from an older child who may also have the impulse to
smash a toy, but who does not act on this impulse because he/she can
anticipate the following consequences:
1. He won't have the toy to play with later on;
2. His parents would be upset if he broke his new toy;
3. He would be upset for letting down his parents;
4. He would be upset because he let his temper get out of control - he
let himself down
In this example, the child has learned to "inhibit" and regulate their
behavior based on internal controls and guidelines, rather than
requiring the immediate threat of external consequences.
Self-Regulation
as the Core Deficit in ADHD
Dr. Barkley argues that the critical deficit associated with ADHD is
the failure to develop this capacity for "self-control", also referred
to as "self-regulation". He suggests that this results primarily
for biological reasons, and not because of parenting.
As a result of this core deficit in self-regulation, specific and
important psychological processes and functions subsequently fail to
develop in an optimal way. These include the following:
* Working Memory, which refers to the ability to recall past events and
manipulate them in one's mind so as to be able to make predictions
about the future. This is an important part of dealing effectively with
day-to-day situations that Barkley feels is diminished in individuals
with ADHD. In fact, recent research has document a deficit in
working memory in individuals with ADHD.
* Internalization of Speech, which refers to the ability to use
internally generated speech to guide one's behavior and actions. Think
about how often you use internal speech - i.e., talking to yourself, to
help regulate and guide your behavior and to solve problems you may be
confronting. Dr Barkley argues that this capacity develops later and
less completely in individuals with ADHD.
* Sense of Time, which refers to the ability to keep track of the
passage of time and to change/alter one's behavior in relation to
time. Consider how often one needs to evaluate the time required
to accomplish a particular task and how the time you are devoting to a
particular task compares to what is available, and what will be
required for other tasks. Dr. Barkley suggests that for individuals
with ADHD, the psychological sense of time is impaired, which prevents
them from being able to modify/alter their behavior in response to real
world time demands. This is seen, for example, in the adolescent
who may become engrossed in a project and wind up spending far more
time on it than should have been allocated, given other demands that
need to be met.
* Goal Directed Behavior, which refers to the ability to establish a
goal in one's mind and use the internal image of that goal to shape,
guide, and direct one's actions. This is an incredibly important
capacity as it underlies consistent effort and persistence. Imagine how
much harder it would be to persevere through difficult and frustrating
times if you were not able to hold a long-term goal in your mind. Dr.
Barkley argues that individuals with ADHD have great difficulty doing
this, and thus have difficulty with making a consistent effort to
achieve long-term goals.
Implications of Considering ADHD a Disorder of Self-regulation
Conceptualizing ADHD as a disorder of self-regulation, and not a
disorder of attention, has significant implications for understanding
the difficulties experienced by individuals with ADHD and how to assist
them in coping more effectively with those difficulties. Below is
a brief summary of Dr. Barkley's views on this.
First, he argues that individuals with ADHD may not lack the skills and
knowledge to be successful, but rather, their problems with
self-regulation often prevent them from applying their knowledge and
skills at the necessary times. As Dr. Barkley puts it, "ADHD is
more a problem of doing what one knows rather than knowing what to
do."
For example, although a child with ADHD may "know" that sharing and
cooperating are an important part of making and keeping friends, he may
fail to apply this knowledge with peers because the immediate rewards
associated with getting one's way overpowers the less salient goal of
keeping a friendship. Or, the child may know the steps to follow to do
a good job on a school project, but not act on this knowledge because
of problems with managing time and using a long-term goal to guide
behavior.
The treatment implication that follows from this conceptualization is
that treatment should focus on helping individuals apply the knowledge
they already have at the appropriate times, rather than on teaching
specific knowledge and skills. This will require frequent external cues
and reminders to apply this knowledge, because their internal guides
for behavior are less effective.
For example, consider the child who does not share and cooperate
because the immediate payoff of getting what he wants is more salient
than the long-term consequences this behavior has for his friendships.
Dr. Barkley would argue that this child may not need to be taught
"social skills", as he already knows the right thing to do. Instead, he
needs to be provided with frequent reminders about how to behave during
actual peer interactions. This could take the form of having the child
review a short set of "social rules" immediately before a playtime with
peers, as well as reminding the child of these rules at regular
intervals during the playtime.
In regards to following classroom rules and getting work done, Dr.
Barkley also emphasizes the need to provide external prompts. Writing
rules down on signs around the classroom is one way to do this. Posting
class rules on an index card taped to the child's desk is another.
During work times, one possibility is to have the child wear headphones
and listen to a tape that provides frequent reminders to stay on task,
to write neatly, and to check one's work. In all of these examples, the
principle is to compensate for the child's inability to control his or
her behavior through internal means by providing as many external
prompts and reminders as possible.
The Limitations of External Prompts and why Rewards are Necessary
Even when external prompts are provided, however, an important
limitation is that their effectiveness remains dependent on the child's
motivation to follow these rules rather than pursuing alternatives that
may be more immediately appealing. Because individuals with ADHD
are so attuned to immediate consequences, however, attractive
short-term alternatives will often be pursued. To enhance the
child's motivation to meet the behavioral expectations that have been
set, therefore, he feels it is necessary to provide rewards and
privileges for meeting those expectations that are more attractive and
appealing than those associated with alternative behaviors the child
could engage in.
What can make this difficult to do with children who have ADHD is the
immediacy with which rewards may need to be provided. For
example, the problem with telling a child with ADHD that having a good
week at school will result in a reward on the weekend is that it
assumes the child can use the anticipation of this reward to guide
their behavior over an entire week. According to Dr. Barkley,
however, this is likely to be ineffective because it depends on the
type of internalized control of behavior that he believes is deficient
to begin with.
To overcome this, he argues that long-term objective must be broken
down into numerous shorter-term goals, each of which has its own
associated reward. For example, the special weekend treat may need to
be supplemented by daily privileges that are contingent on the child's
meeting specific behavioral expectations each day. Behavioral
expectations for the day may need to be broken down into numerous
shorter intervals during the day. Frequent reminders to the child
about what those expectations are, and what will be attained by meeting
them, may also need to be incorporated. Obviously, this is very
difficult to do, and is one reason why implementing an effective
behavioral treatment plan for a child with ADHD can be so challenging.
It is important to emphasize, however, that this approach is not
equivalent to rewarding the child for simply doing what he should be
doing in the first place, as is sometimes argued. As Dr. Barkley
notes, "...the required response of others to the poor self-control
shown by those with ADHD is not to eliminate the outcomes of their
actions and to excuse them from personal accountability. It is to
temporally tighten up those consequences, emphasizing more immediate
accountability."
In other words, a child with ADHD is not "let off the hook" because of
their condition. Instead, one needs to heighten the child's
accountability in the form of more frequent checks and feedback on
their behavior, supplemented by the provision of appropriate rewards
and privileges when desired standards of behavior have been met.
Why Treatment Needs to be Ongoing and Long-term
Even when these principles are faithfully applied, recognizing that the
behaviors seen in ADHD reults from an underlying deficit in
self-regulation implies that gains associated with treatment will not
persist after treatment is discontinued. Thus, treatment reflects
an ongoing effort to manage the child's symptoms rather than "curing"
the disorder.
While this may be discouraging, Dr. Barkley also notes that as children
with ADHD mature, their diminished capacity for self-regulation will
mature as well. Thus, even though they may never fully catch up to
their peers in this regard, their ability to guide and govern their
behavior via internal means will nonetheless grow and develop. Over
time, therefore, an individual's reliance on external sources of
motivation will diminish, as will the required intensity and frequency
with which these external source are need to be provided. Eventually,
the adolescent or young adult with ADHD may learn to provide their own
external prompts in the form of lists and other types of cues that
prove to be effective, and to provide themselves with their own rewards
for meeting their self-imposed standards.
Another treatment implication that follows from Dr. Barkley's model is
that medication treatment may be effective because it normalizes, or at
least improves, the underlying deficit in behavioral inhibition that he
regards as the core feature of ADHD. Dr. Barkley reviews evidence for
this contention in his book, and argues that medication is the only
currently available treatment that has been demonstrated to produce
such results. As such, he believes that it should be the predominant
treatment approach for individuals with ADHD.
Summary and
Conclusions
Barkley's theory has been widely recognized as a significant advance in
our thinking about ADHD that helps to organize a vast body of
literature and clinical observations about the disorder. As with
any theory, it's ultimate value will depend on the amount of new
research that it stimulates, and the information that is obtained from
those studies.
One important point to note is that even if one agress with Barkley's
notion that ADHD is fundamentally a deficit of self-regulation, it does
not necesarily follow that the interventions he advocates - basically,
behavior therapy and medication treatment - are the only approaches to
be pursued. Clearly, these are the interventions that currently
enjoy the strongest empirical support. They are limited, however,
in that neither is conceptualized as resulting in any enduring change
in the child. External prompts and the provision of rewards are
intended to compensatge for the child's deficits rather than correct
them and medication provides a short-term improvement in those deficits
that vanishes when it has cleared the child's system.
What about the possibility of interventions that may result in more
enduring changes in the child? The capacity for self-regulation
and the other executive functions (e.g., working memory) that Barkley
describes are ultimately the outcomes of aspects of brain
functioning. Given what we know about the plasticity of the
nervous system, especially at younger ages, is it possible that
children with ADHD could be provided with specific cognitive training
exercises and experience that might result in more enduring changes in
their functioning?
In the field of ADHD, this is the proverbial $64,000 question.
There are, in fact, intriguing hints that this may be possible. For
example, recent research has demonstrated that computerized training of
working memory skills is associated with a decrease in ADHD
symptoms. Whether such changes are enduring, however, remains to
be demonstrated. There have also been a number of studies of
neurofeedback - a treatment approach that attempts to teach individuals
to alter and control basic aspects of brain functioning - in which more
enduring changes in the child have been suggested. At this point,
however, far more research will be required to determine the value of
these approaches and whether they are capable of producing any
longer-term benefits.
In this regard, it is is disappointing to find that when one surveys
the research literature on ADHD, the number of studies that have
investigated these types of approaches is extremely limited.
Relative to the hundreds and hundreds of studies that have been
published on behavior and medication therapy, the number studies of
treatments intended to result in enduring changes in the child is
remarkably few.
Although research on behavior and medication therapy is clearly
important, and the treatments that have emerged from this research has
been beneficial for many children and families, it is time to also
begin serious investigation of interventions that are intended to
produce more enduring changes in children with ADHD. Lets hope
that this is already occurring and that there will be interesting
research on these issues that will emerge with greater frequency over
the next several years.